Closed mmccarty closed 4 years ago
No, just some extra kwargs that need to be passed down. This is needed to support versions xgboost < 1.0 that need to scale.
This looks fine at a glance. I'm tempted to just ignore the CI failures unless @gforsyth is actively working on them and somewhat close to fixing it? At least the new tests aren't failing.
Thanks @TomAugspurger I believe he is, but I'm gonna poke at some CI stuff here as well.
Just need to add sample_weight to the regressor and double check the docs strings then this will be ready for another look.
Ready for another look.
Thanks @mmccarty
Is this on the path towards compatibility with xgboost 1.0?