Upcoming Meeting: July 31st 2019

dat-ecosystem / consortium

Process Information for the Dat Protocol Working Group (Notes, Agenda, Members)

39 stars 5 forks source link

Upcoming Meeting: July 31st 2019 #60

Closed RangerMauve closed 5 years ago

RangerMauve commented 5 years ago

Please comment with proposed agenda items (start comment with AGENDA ITEM). When a comment gets a +1 from a WG member, then we will add it to the agenda.

Proposed Agenda

Meetings Prep

Before Meeting:
- [x] Create new meeting notes file from template
- [x] Add links to: agenda discussion, previous meeting action items, previous meeting notes
- [x] Put agenda in notes
After Meeting:
- [x] Make Action Items Issue, list action items
- [x] Commit meeting notes to working-group repo
- [ ] Make New Meeting Agenda Issue

RangerMauve commented 5 years ago

Talk about extensions and how they relate to the daemon and Beaker.
Talk about grouping hypercores together (for use cases using multifeed)
Talk about more fine grained control over networking https://github.com/cabal-club/cabal-cli/issues/113

RangerMauve commented 5 years ago

Talk about use of MDNS in hyperswarm https://github.com/hyperswarm/discovery/issues/7

RangerMauve commented 5 years ago

Talk about backwards compatibility with old hyperdrive

pfrazee commented 5 years ago

Share this protocol dev roadmap and make sure everybody's on the same page

ghost commented 5 years ago

adding an optional boolean ack field to HAVE messages https://github.com/mafintosh/hypercore/pull/215#issuecomment-515804589

hackergrrl commented 5 years ago

I'd like to try to better understand Dat SDK's specific needs around multifeed/corestore/etc, which I'm kinda fuzzy on still.

RangerMauve commented 5 years ago

@noffle Would you mind if we discussed the SDK thing outside of the working group call? I'm worried about time for some of these other things.

RangerMauve commented 5 years ago

Also, from @karissa

hey all, for the next meeting I'd like to put on the agenda discussing governance of the dat foundation and how we can adopt (or avoid) models from other open source foundations (e.g., linux, node, raspberry pi, etc).. I'd like to transition out of what is now a narrowly defined 'leadership' role and have a transparent voting collective make decisions by January, so we have time to make this transition and work 14:27 together to craft a governance model that we all like 14:28 btw: the 'foundation' decides what to do with donations

RangerMauve commented 5 years ago

Also, to save time I'd like to put off some of the technical stuff I wanted to discuss until next time.

hackergrrl commented 5 years ago

@RangerMauve that's fine, yes!

I'd also like to bring up hypercore performance when many (hundreds) of cores are being loaded and replicated.

RangerMauve commented 5 years ago

Also, it'd be nice to quickly peek at this replication management proposal to integrate with the daemon / SDK.