Organize bibliography

[restrellado]

@jrosen48 Fyi there's a spec for the bibliography in the T&F author guidelines. Wasn't sure if you've seen that yet?

[jrosen48]

checking

[jrosen48]

Here are the guidelines w/ some responses:

The reference list/bibliography for each chapter should be placed at the end of each chapter. Avoid providing a single reference list/bibliography at the back of the book unless appropriate to your discipline. This will give readers the additional option of accessing your book by chapter.

I'm inclined to end of the book (and I think this is more common); I think references by chapter would be more common for an edited book. Though it is possible to do this if we want. Perhaps something to ask Hannah about.

Ensure that your references are consistently presented in terms of: the order in which details are listed; use of capitalization; use of italics and punctuation.

Will do.

Book and journal titles should always be in italics, regardless of which style guide you are following.

Will do.

Ensure that each entry includes all publication details as applicable: author/editor name(s) and initials; date of publication; book or article title; journal title and volume number; place of publication; publisher; page numbers for chapter or journal articles.

Will do.

Please include DOIs (Digital Object Identifiers) for all publications you reference (including books) where available, this guarantees that others will be able to easily locate and access your listed references.

Will do, perhaps after an initial pass through.

It is essential that the reference list/bibliography includes every work cited by you in the text.

OK.

Please do not include search engine or database search URLs (e.g. EBSCO, Google, etc.).

OK.

Please ensure you check that the date for each entry in the reference list/bibliography matches the date cited in the text reference. This will avoid time-consuming queries at copyediting stage.

Noting this.

[jrosen48]

There are different style preferences for different subject areas, such as Chicago or APA. Your Editorial Assistant will advise which style you should follow.

Confirm APA?

[jrosen48]

I think these are mostly on the right track, but leaving this open. Going to close #196, as that only contained this related issue:

One question I have has to do with how certain kinds of citations will render; it may take another iteration to get them behaving correctly, especially for those where the text is something like “Author’s (2019)” book, Data Science in Education)” - I think the apostrophe may not have ended up in the correct place (based on how I did it).

[ivelasq]

Not sure if this belongs under this issue, but there are chapters where the references are not in the book.bib file (example: Chapter 10 under Tidy the dataset).

[jrosen48]

Wondering if there's a way to tell bookdown that we want the references to be rendered in APA format. That would help to address a number of these requirements at once.

There is something in the bookdown book on this, but it seems to suggest it only applies to the PDF output:

Once you have one or multiple .bib files, you may use the field bibliography in the YAML metadata of your first R Markdown document (which is typically index.Rmd), and you can also specify the bibliography style via biblio-style (this only applies to PDF output), e.g.,
---
bibliography: ["one.bib", "another.bib", "yet-another.bib"]
biblio-style: "apalike"
link-citations: true
---
```{}

[ivelasq]

ahh, I think I made a mistake in the index.Rmd file in that it's not in quotes!

[ivelasq]

https://github.com/data-edu/data-science-in-education/blob/master/index.Rmd

[ivelasq]

please feel free to fix and I will rerender.

[jrosen48]

sweet to the beat, will do

[ivelasq]

Added the apa_pl.csl file and pandoc args to _output.yml and rerendered - looks like APA format now!