Ch 10/write new content

[restrellado]

Includes general review plus review for style.

I tested the code and it runs. Still needs a code review for style and a grammar review.

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for datascienceineducation-1ed ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	5d22f56ae57da711d52ff86ab26bee2f70649f8a
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/datascienceineducation-1ed/deploys/6702b00763043f00081da2ea
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-599--datascienceineducation-1ed.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[jrosen48]

Minor -- should we consider using purrr::pluck() for this code?

https://purrr.tidyverse.org/reference/pluck.html

all_files[[5]]

What made me think of this was that we say, "Now that you know the 2016 dataset is the fifth element in the list, pluck it out by using double brackets"!

[jrosen48]

Another minor code-related thing -- why do we have to quote 2012 here (can it not be treated as an integer)?

model_data %>%
  filter(year == "2012") %>%
  summary()

[jrosen48]

Very minor - are we using dataset or data set?

[jrosen48]

Are we avoiding contractions? Aren't, they're, etc.

I think so, but want to confirm.

[jrosen48]

Also, you'll, you're, here's

[restrellado]

Minor -- should we consider using purrr::pluck() for this code?

https://purrr.tidyverse.org/reference/pluck.html

all_files[[5]]

What made me think of this was that we say, "Now that you know the 2016 dataset is the fifth element in the list, pluck it out by using double brackets"!

Deferring to code guru @ivelasq on this. No strong feelings from me either way. But I won't let the decision block the merge. Happy to open another PR if we decide to do it.

[restrellado]

Very minor - are we using dataset or data set?

For both of these style questions, I posted in Slack to revisit. I'll merge and am happy to open another PR in case we need to make changes for either contractions or "dataset" vs "data set."

[restrellado]

Another minor code-related thing -- why do we have to quote 2012 here (can it not be treated as an integer)?

model_data %>%
  filter(year == "2012") %>%
  summary()

We could probably remove. But I just checked and at that part of the walkthrough year is a factor. That's probably why I used quotes. That may be an outdated way of doing it—let me know if so. I'm going to merge as is, but happy to change if anyone has strong feelings.