search

data2health / architecting_attribution

This project aims to provide a mechanism to track and provide attribution.
Other
6 stars 0 forks source link

Investigate "object type" data models (e.g. vocabularies/taxonomies) #27

Closed kristiholmes closed 5 years ago

kristiholmes commented 5 years ago

Some of the suggestions include MeSH publication types, wikidata, etc. MJ looking for what's available in RDF. :-)

Overall Qs to resolve:

mellybelly commented 5 years ago

The requirements I know of thus far are: 1) search faceting 2) alignment with upper level types within our discovery index 3) typing of contribution artifacts (presume they can be multiply-typed?)

It would be good to serve up the data in multiple ways, lets make a separate ticket for the sci-platform for this purpose.

It might be a good idea to have a requirements document in this repo to further describe the needs with examples of how they would work.

diatomsRcool commented 5 years ago

Also look at CRediT and TaDiRAH. There are loads of vocabularies for this.

marijane commented 5 years ago

Thank you, @diatomsRcool !

mellybelly commented 5 years ago

@marijane has an ontological version of CRediT linked herein (we were contributors) but i had not seen TaDiRAH, cool!

marijane commented 5 years ago

@mellybelly Anne's CRediT link is actually a link to the CASRAI Objects, it's worth checking out!

mellybelly commented 5 years ago

yes, this is what we contributed to (it was a working group). but the end result is not computable, so that was the need for the OWL version ;-)

kristiholmes commented 5 years ago

CASRAI works in the context of existing research information systems, which is important for harmonizing across various systems. This also makes it easier for information systems to adopt and implement. This is one of the reasons we mapped the NISO research objects vocabulary to different existing research information system data models (researchfish, figshare, scopus & WoS, etc.). I don't have a strong feeling about what to use, just that we use something. The NISO framework underwent significant peer review, so that is why we started there.

kristiholmes commented 5 years ago

@diatomsRcool have you seen any specific mappings of the CASRAI object terms to research system data models, by chance? I am wondering if this mapping has been completed in a systematic manner. Thanks for your suggestions!

marijane commented 5 years ago

@mellybelly our OWL implementation is limited to the CASRAI contributor roles, it does not cover the objects. Did I miss something, is it supposed to include them?

kristiholmes commented 5 years ago

no - these are separate

diatomsRcool commented 5 years ago

@kristiholmes I have not, but for my work in RDA, we will/may add some of the CASRAI object terms to VIVO.

kristiholmes commented 5 years ago

@diatomsRcool very nice! I didnt realize there was a RDA VIVO project. Thanks again for the pointer to this vocabulary

diatomsRcool commented 5 years ago

It's not formal, but we are looking to form a list of terms from the community for adding to VIVO. Let me know if you have terms you want to add. We'll probably start with higher level terms first, tho.

kristiholmes commented 5 years ago

CASRAI - URIs MeSH - RDF COAR - RDF