Open mbrush opened 5 years ago
I agree this is useful information but i worry it gets too much into modeling people. however it is a sort of secondary transitive attributution to the environment/context/org in which the contribution was made.
I guess i would err on keeping it and getting feedback. People do want to be able to query for these sorts of contributions all the time: what are the products of my post-docs? for example.
I might leave this out upon further thinking - it seems to be the type of modeling that would be in places like VIVO, i guess i don't think person status belongs in this model? obviously the questions are interesting but they should be answserable when you combine data from expertise/profiling systems? good point though about how to answer these questions when there is no other data or system to do the person association to these types of contexts.
Should we include an attribute on the Contribution object that lets us capture the professional position/title/status of an agent when the contribution was made? This would support queries like "Find papers with more than 4 contributions by graduate students"
Or should this be handled as part of the Agent model which we defer to implementations to define?