Open cmungall opened 3 years ago
Why CRO and not CrediT?
This is probably a Q for OSTI (ORCIDconsortium@osti.gov) or our ORCID representative (b.minihan@orcid.org).
I thought CRO was incorporating CrediT. We would also like to adopt an ORCID compatible contributor ontology in TIB's ConfIDent project and as far as I can tell the VIVO comunity would do so as well.
Our CrediT import is in https://github.com/data2health/contributor-role-ontology/blob/master/imports/credit_import.owl and is referenced in the built CRO files. Note that this is our OWL implementation of CrediT, as far as I know CASRAI has not published an RDF version of their own, but we try to use all their URLs.
Our CrediT repo is at https://github.com/data2health/credit-ontology
As for whether CRO is compatible with ORCiD, I do not know what that might involve. I suspect that's ORCiD's call, because it involves their API.
cc @elishawc - we would like to adopt CRO but it seems ORCID is only compatible with CREDIT?
https://info.orcid.org/credit-for-research-contribution/
are there recommendations for using CRO but having things be reflected correctly in ORCID? E.g is there a standard rollup table?