Closed marijane closed 6 years ago
I imagine that you won't use the full 7 or 8 digit namespace ever for this ontology, even if you reserved ranges for different editors, so it may only be a question of aesthetics. I'd keep it lighter and just move the 8 digit one down to 7. Or officially depreciate the 8 digit one and create the 7 digit one.
Agreed, we probably won't use the full namespace. Since we haven't done an official release yet, I think I'm just going to edit it down to 7. Thank you, @Public-Health-Bioinformatics, I really appreciate your input!
This issue was moved to data2health/credit-ontology#1
It was generated by the ontology-starter-kit, and I failed to notice until after I'd added the CRediT roles. I think most of the OBO ontologies I've looked at use 7 digits.
Should we bump all the identifiers up to 8 digits or knock this one down to 7?