An OWL implementation of CRediT; a high-level classification of the diverse roles performed in the work leading to a published research output in the sciences. Its purpose to provide transparency in contributions to scholarly published work, to enable improved systems of attribution, credit, and accountability.
I do not know how to deal with capitalisation of the terms, though. It is indeed not a big deal to build compatible workflow when only the capitalisation is different.
I have indeed problems to find a way to tell my code that
Writing – review & editing == writing review and editing role
while I have not problem with
project administration role== Project administration:
some of the terms were modified from the credit taxonomy, see #3.
For compatibility issue, I would "revert" the #name tag to the credit taxonomy term, as present on http://credit.niso.org/implementing-credit/
I do not know how to deal with capitalisation of the terms, though. It is indeed not a big deal to build compatible workflow when only the capitalisation is different.
I have indeed problems to find a way to tell my code that
Writing – review & editing==writing review and editing rolewhile I have not problem with
project administration role==Project administration:grepl (Project administration,project administration role, , ignore.case = TRUE)