How common is it to refer to a binary built for macOS as "darwin"? I'd go with "macos" instead of "darwin", but I'm also fine with "darwin" as long as most macOS users can recognize it.
What's the most recent Mac hardware that only has x86-64 v2? Does Go 1.21 still support the latest version of macOS that can run on it? If not, I don't see why we would need an x86-64 v2 build.
maximko
commented
11 months ago
How common is it to refer to a binary built for macOS as "darwin"? I'd go with "macos" instead of "darwin", but I'm also fine with "darwin" as long as most macOS users can recognize it.
What's the most recent Mac hardware that only has x86-64 v2? Does Go 1.21 still support the latest version of macOS that can run on it? If not, I don't see why we would need an x86-64 v2 build.