databricks / terraform-provider-databricks

Databricks Terraform Provider
https://registry.terraform.io/providers/databricks/databricks/latest
Other
453 stars 389 forks source link

[ISSUE] Issue creating private workspace prior to registering DNS record #1645

Open alyssons-db opened 2 years ago

alyssons-db commented 2 years ago

Expected Behavior

Expect the workspace to be successfully created and terraform apply to complete successfully when creating a workspace with front end PrivateLink

Actual Behavior

Although the workspace is created successfully, the apply fails because there is a health check at the end that calls the /api/2.0/token/list API. Since the hostname itself needs to be first registered in the DNS to point to the private IP of the endpoint, the check fails saying that the endpoint is not reachable.

Error: cannot create mws workspaces: workspace https://aso-workspace.cloud.databricks.com/ is not yet reachable: Get "https://aso-workspace.cloud.databricks.com/api/2.0/token/list": context deadline exceeded - rate limited: context deadline exceeded

If I created the DNS record prior to trying to create the workspace, the apply completes successfully.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Run 'terraform apply' to create workspace with PrivateLink for the front-end

Terraform and provider versions

Terraform v1.2.7

nkvuong commented 2 years ago

This is where the issue arises, as the provider verifies that the workspace is reachable https://github.com/databricks/terraform-provider-databricks/blob/master/mws/resource_mws_workspaces.go#L179

@alexott we can add a parameter to relax this check, what do you think?

alexott commented 2 years ago

we can, but we still need to perform some check to make sure that workspace is created & reachable. Maybe we need to check if workspace is with private link, and use some other URL?

alyssons-db commented 2 years ago

Can we just call the Account API to check if the status of the workspace is RUNNING? https://accounts.cloud.databricks.com/api/2.0 /accounts/{account_id}/workspaces/{workspace_id}

https://docs.databricks.com/dev-tools/api/latest/account.html#operation/get-workspace

[image: email_signature_logo_sm]

Alysson Souza

Specialist Solutions Architect - Cloud Infra & Security

Mobile: +61 420533927

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 2:41 PM Alex Ott @.***> wrote:

we can, but we still need to perform some check to make sure that workspace is created & reachable. Maybe we need to check if workspace is with private link, and use some other URL?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/databricks/terraform-provider-databricks/issues/1645#issuecomment-1262221180, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A2OTJM5FSXK7BPIN4QFP4TTWAWE7JANCNFSM6AAAAAAQYXHINU . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.*** com>

alexott commented 2 years ago

Issue is not only make sure that workspace is running, but also that DNS is propagated...

alyssons-db commented 2 years ago

I don't think this is an issue for private workspaces. There won't be a public DNS record to propagate because the IP is private. Customers will need to register on their own DNS servers or use something like Route53 hosted zones to register before accessing the workspace.

At least the above is my understanding, or am I missing something?

[image: email_signature_logo_sm]

Alysson Souza

Specialist Solutions Architect - Cloud Infra & Security

Mobile: +61 420533927

On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 5:02 PM Alex Ott @.***> wrote:

Issue is not only make sure that workspace is running, but also that DNS is propagated...

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/databricks/terraform-provider-databricks/issues/1645#issuecomment-1262410755, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A2OTJM5NNBVY73EZ2CHZ4K3WAWVO7ANCNFSM6AAAAAAQYXHINU . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.*** com>

nfx commented 2 years ago

I'm okay with adding skip_dns_verify, but i'd rather wait for provider split, which will use the Go SDK.

jtthackery commented 6 months ago

Hi, I'm also running into this issue, was skip_dns_verify (or another solution) implemented?