Closed pixie79 closed 6 months ago
This probably should apply at the entity level mostly however it may be worth also allowing a whole dataset to also be defined as PII but generally I believe this should be at the entity level especially when you get to Right to be Forgotten, it may be that some bit can be forgotten straight away but other information needs to be kept longer.
e.g if you keep the last 5 addresses of a customer, at the point they stop being a customer if you do need to retain records for legal reasons you probably have no grounds to keep more than the current address.
Thanks, @pixie79 for this contribution.
I agree that PII and RTBF become more and more important and the data contracts should be the source of truth to configure the attributes for individual fields or models.
They also play nicely with some Policy as Code engines.
At the moment, however, I do not feel confident enough to defining a generic fieldset that fits for these engines.
So, for now, I'd propose to go with config
fields.
E.g.:
fields:
customer_email_address:
description: The email address, as entered by the customer. The email address was not verified.
type: text
format: email
pii: true
classification: sensitive
config:
pii:
method: MASKED
description: For a name, replace with 5 asterisks
analiticsLinkedEntity: Linked version of the entity in this record that is used for analytics premasked
rightToBeForgottonPolicy:
eligible: true
method: DELETE
lifetime: 300
description: RTBF applies 300 days after last customer activity
I think that makes sense and meets what I was looking for from it.
while the current specifications include PII (Personally Identifiable Information) and classification designators, we should extend the design to include more detailed actions and attributes related to PII handling and compliance. Here are some suggestions for enhancing the schema:
PII Handling Attributes:
Schema Explanation
This structure ensures all necessary details are captured and provides a robust framework for managing PII and compliance with data protection regulations.