search

datafoodconsortium / ontology

The DFC ontology is available as OWL and RDF.
https://datafoodconsortium.gitbook.io/dfc-standard-documentation/semantic-specifications
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
18 stars 3 forks source link

Publish ontology on LOV #10

Closed RachL closed 2 years ago

RachL commented 5 years ago

Submitting to LOV means we have an URI for our vocabulary. Once we do, we will use this link https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/suggest to submit our vocabulary. The LOV team will review it and upload it in LOV.

This is blocked by https://github.com/datafoodconsortium/ontology/issues/11

RachL commented 5 years ago

URL are ready thanks to @pacodelaluna here:

https://github.com/datafoodconsortium/datafoodconsortium.github.io/pull/4

With this result:

http://datafoodconsortium.org/ontologies/DFC_BusinessOntology.owl http://datafoodconsortium.org/ontologies/DFC_FullModel.owl http://datafoodconsortium.org/ontologies/DFC_ProductGlossary.owl

myriamboure commented 5 years ago

I just asked Bernard how exactly to put the new links in the full model that refers to the datafoodconsortium domains. So waiting for his answer, we need to do that before we publish on LOV.

tfrancart commented 5 years ago
pacodelaluna commented 5 years ago

@tfrancart Just did it there, https://github.com/datafoodconsortium/datafoodconsortium.github.io/commit/3be1f088c70aabdeb17e2418b8324e5bbbc87958, tell me if any issue.

tfrancart commented 5 years ago

Yes, there is an issue in http://datafoodconsortium.org/ontologies/DFC_BusinessOntology.owl : the xml:base is wrong, it is missing the ".owl" extension at the end. Did you remove it by hand ? you should have e.g. xml:base="http://datafoodconsortium.org/ontologies/DFC_BusinessOntology".owl; other files look OK, but please double check on your side.

pacodelaluna commented 5 years ago

Good catch! Just fixed it, and cross-checked also, should be good.

myriamboure commented 4 years ago

Awesome ! I contact back the people at LOV to see if we are good to publish now :-) Thank you @pacodelaluna and @tfrancart !

myriamboure commented 4 years ago

I just submitted the full model URI (which refers to the two other ones) on LOV through the link shared Ghislain here https://github.com/datafoodconsortium/ontology/issues/7 Capture du 2019-09-19 10-46-24 Capture du 2019-09-19 10-51-03

I'm afraid we might be missing a title, description, etc, don't know how and where to add them, if it should be somewhere in the URI, etc. I @ him on the other discussion, let's see what he says !

tfrancart commented 4 years ago

Also you probably need to submit the 3 ontologies, not only the full model. Titles and descriptions can be added fairly easily in Protégé.

Le jeu. 19 sept. 2019 à 10:50, Myriam notifications@github.com a écrit :

I just submitted the full model URI (which refers to the two other ones) on LOV through the link shared Ghislain here #7 https://github.com/datafoodconsortium/ontology/issues/7 [image: Capture du 2019-09-19 10-46-24] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/8135376/65228695-342b9b00-dacb-11e9-8048-c2aeb947da0c.png I'm afraid we might be missing a title, description, etc, don't know how and where to add them, if it should be somewhere in the URI, etc. I @ him on the other discussion, let's see what he says !

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/datafoodconsortium/ontology/issues/10?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAU2H4IJCC6VEFV2ZITYENTQKM4N5A5CNFSM4H34KLV2YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7CXH2Q#issuecomment-533033962, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAU2H4KUOIYSX3ZFBRZJMRTQKM4N5ANCNFSM4H34KLVQ .

--

Thomas Francart - SPARNA Web de données | Architecture de l'information | Accès aux connaissances blog : blog.sparna.fr, site : sparna.fr, linkedin : fr.linkedin.com/in/thomasfrancart tel : +33 (0)6.71.11.25.97, skype : francartthomas

myriamboure commented 4 years ago

Ok thanks @tfrancart

2 todo then :

Rachel and I will work on it.

gatemezing commented 4 years ago

Hi @myriamboure. I've just seen the submitted link in LOV, so yes it will be cool to add all relevant metadata to the vocabulary (title, description, authors, version, publishers, etc). Anything that can self described the ontology. You can see this reference here http://pyvandenbussche.info/wp-content/papercite-data/pdf/2011-pyv-lov-metadata-wp.pdf

Regarding uploading the imported vocabularies, our bot only found that DFC_BusinessOntology should be added or absent in LOV ecosystem. Do you really reuse some terms from the ProductGlossary (aka DFC_ProductGlossary.owl?)

RachL commented 4 years ago

Hi @gatemezing ! We have just found how to add the meta data and the links should all be updated now. Do we need to re-submit something? Thanks for your help :)

gatemezing commented 4 years ago

Great @RachL ! I've added it into LOV. Congrats :) See https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs/dfc and https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs/dfcb. I might need the URIs for the creator and the contributors (It could be LinkedIn URL, ORCID, etc). Also, you might need to add the same metadata for this one http://datafoodconsortium.org/ontologies/DFC_BusinessOntology.owl (business ontology)

simonLouvet commented 4 years ago

hello @gatemezing, i try to obtain foaf uri with a linkedin profile and i can't. can yon explain how do do this please.

simonLouvet commented 4 years ago

hello @gatemezing, I realize that rdf:about does not necessarily need to reference a semantic resource and can reference a web page. I will modify the owl file.

RachL commented 4 years ago

Currently blocked by https://github.com/datafoodconsortium/dfc-prototype-V3/issues/1

simonLouvet commented 3 years ago

hello @gatemezing. We have have made a lot of progress on the cleaning and evolution of ours ontologies. we need to republish the 4 cleaned ontologies on LOV but I have difficulties to do so. problem 1/ the prefix does not appear when submitting an ontology while it seems to be well filled in the file problem 2 / I don't know how to update an existing ontology

You can find the ontology files on this page: http://static.datafoodconsortium.org/

gatemezing commented 3 years ago

Hello @simonLouvet, thanks for these questions. 1/ - Are you using the same URIs? if yes, I can check in our backend. 2/- Considering that the vocab is already in LOV, just ping me and I will add the new version for traceability :) BTW many links in http://static.datafoodconsortium.org/ are 404. Could you check them? HTH

simonLouvet commented 3 years ago

Hi @gatemezing , thanks a lot for your answer :-) 1/ uris of 4 ontologies changed 2/ ok, thanks

Dead links were bugs. it's ok now.

RachL commented 3 years ago

hello @gatemezing I think everything is ready on our side. Are you able to add the new version? Many thanks :)

gatemezing commented 3 years ago

Great @RachL . I start now the process :) See https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs/dfc BTW I see in the publication.rdf that you all have the same URI to ORCID. Is that correct? See below the owl:sameAs. I can use any other permanent URI (e.g., LinkedIn) `<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:foaf="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/" xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#">

Louvet Simon Arnould Rachel Chabot Bernard Data Food Consortium `
simonLouvet commented 3 years ago

Hello @gatemezing . Thank you for spotting this error. The wrong references have been removed. As we have mastered the editing of this file, we may add more references in the future.

simonLouvet commented 3 years ago

Thanks à lot @gatemezing for DFC ontology publication on LOV.

Ontologies seems well pulblished but Platorm seems not manage Class and Ontology content : https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs?q=dfc

image

RDF serialised ontology version could be better intergated than OWL? http://static.datafoodconsortium.org/ontologies/DFC_FullModel.rdf

gatemezing commented 3 years ago

Yeah, I see that the snapshot (N3) at https://lov.linkeddata.es/dataset/lov/vocabs/dfc-b/versions/2019-10-21.n3 is full of blank nodes. That explains the view (AFAICT). Could you send me valid N3 files so that I double check again?

simonLouvet commented 3 years ago

hello @gatemezing , Protégé don't provide N3 export but I can do if it is needed by LOV. image

I can export into TTL (turtle), OWL and RDF as you can see in screenshot. OWL and RDF are ever available at http://static.datafoodconsortium.org/

RachL commented 3 years ago

@gatemezing Hello! I'm just checking in: are N3 format still needed?

RachL commented 2 years ago

@amardeilh do you confirm this is handled now and I close this?

amardeilh commented 2 years ago

@RachL you can close it as it has been published in LOV. We'll need to update this publication with the new version we are working on, but for me it is a new issue.

RachL commented 2 years ago

AWESOOOOOME