search

datafoodconsortium / ontology

The DFC ontology is available as OWL and RDF.
https://datafoodconsortium.gitbook.io/dfc-standard-documentation/semantic-specifications
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
20 stars 3 forks source link

SocialMedia seems to have no properties #101

Closed lecoqlibre closed 9 months ago

lecoqlibre commented 1 year ago

@Alcoz I can't see any property for the SocialMedia class in protégé. Also there is nothing about it in the Changelog file.

The SocialMedia class should not contains the name and the url properties?

Alcoz commented 1 year ago

You are right, SocialMedia should have an URL. For the name, every concept under DFC_BusinessOntology_Subject has a name, so SocialMedia has it.

mkllnk commented 11 months ago

Any update on this? We would like to use this ASAP or we have to code it ourselves.

lecoqlibre commented 11 months ago

Yes @mkllnk ;)

You can look at the SUPPORTED.md file in the data-model-uml repo. I try to keep it updated. You'll see in the codegen-issue3 version of this file that the SocialMedia is supported (both name and URL).

Since you did agree on this issue, it will be available soon as I will merge the codegen-issue3.

EDIT: The connector-codegen v1.0.0 and the data-model-uml v2.1.0 has been released. The social media are officially supported by the UML model and the Ruby connector.

Alcoz commented 9 months ago

SocialMedia already have the name property and websitePage property has been added in v1.10.0