Closed RaggedStaff closed 2 weeks ago
This seems to also include the decision around transmission of inverse relationships, I thought we already merged that in PR #15 . :confused:
Btw @RaggedStaff I'm not sure I can review here (and sorry it took me so long to see my review was required here 😱 )
@RaggedStaff what should we do with this PR?
Ping @Alcoz @lecoqlibre
We still need to review/merge this PR.
@simonLouvet This was a change you requested, would you mind reviewing please?
Amended Taxonomy Update process to clarify that SKOS graph must be included to allow SKOS relationships to be inferred.
Closes #19