Open ycrouin opened 3 weeks ago
Agreed, we can go for level 1 oniy but give it the full taxonomy in the context as few-shot examples. To save on output tokens, we could also only ask the model to output a number like 0 -> none and 1-5 -> corresponding CARDS category.
Define our contrarian claims taxonomy. We can reuse the CARDS taxonomy or come up with our own.
Note: See here for an update on the CARDS taxonomy
Definition Of Done
We have a list of classes and their defintion.
To get started, maybe we could start simple, only with the "Level 1" from the CARDS taxonomy?