Closed jwodder closed 1 year ago
Base: 70.69% // Head: 71.06% // Increases project coverage by +0.36%
:tada:
Coverage data is based on head (
4992d5a
) compared to base (24727b8
). Patch coverage: 66.66% of modified lines in pull request are covered.
:umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
@yarikoptic Test added and passes in at least one run.
@yarikoptic The root error seems to be that one of the file URLs temporarily failed, and that triggered a bug in fusepy. It has nothing to do with fsspec's atomicity.
@yarikoptic The root error seems to be that one of the file URLs temporarily failed, and that triggered a bug in fusepy. It has nothing to do with fsspec's atomicity.
I've reran the failing test ... it passed, let's proceed. Filed dedicated #87 for a possible improvement
Sine works -- let's finalize/merge/release. Ideally: could you add a test which would operate in multiple threads over some limited set of files , so we would double test that all works good? (or it would need also https://github.com/fsspec/filesystem_spec/pull/1111 to work?)