Closed mih closed 1 year ago
We have the exact same issue in reverse for get
. The subdataset record remains "absent". In both cases, the underlying command does not touch the subdataset's root folder -- so when the corresponding item is not expanded, gooey does not get notified.
We need a patch analog to datalad_gooey/patches/clone.py
it seems.
After https://github.com/datalad/datalad-gooey/pull/348 this is only an issue for directory items that have never been expanded
No longer an issue (tested with 40bf82f71e2e6e2e8292bc8622df385a34ee4135)
This may be the result of a confusion. For a subdataset that was dropped in-full, where the tree item is not expanded, the only thing that could change is the "State" annotation. Right now it keeps saying "clean". Maybe it should switch to "absent"?