Open psadil opened 11 months ago
A PR would be great!
Are there standards or heuristics for organizing the contents of non-bids? For example, Field 31011 unzips to the following
./31011_2_0:
lh.native.Glasser.annot native.fMRI_space.Glasser.nii.gz native.Glasser.nii.gz rh.native.Glasser.annot
Without additional constraint, I organize this as something like
$ tree ses-2
ses-2
└── non-bids
├── fMRI
│ └── atlas_parcellation
│ └── native.fMRI_space.Glasser.nii.gz
└── T1
└── atlas_parcellation
├── lh.native.Glasser.annot
├── native.Glasser.nii.gz
└── rh.native.Glasser.annot
The key choices being
native.fMRI_space
vs native.
)Does that organization seem okay? Let me know if there is a preference for a different amount of integration with the existing structure (that is, either heavier use of BIDS entities or something closer to an unzipping of subfolders by field within the non-bids
subdirectory).
Several imaging derivatives were contributed to the UKB by Mansour et al., 2023. bioRvix, doi: 10.1101/2023.03.10.532036 and github.com/sina-mansour/UKB-connectomics, and these are available as bulk files/blobs.
https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/label.cgi?id=200 https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/label.cgi?id=201 https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/label.cgi?id=202 https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/label.cgi?id=203 https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/label.cgi?id=204 https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/field.cgi?id=31000
When the relevant fields are specified in
ukb-init
, they are deposited underneath the sub-[id] directoryCan these be added to ukb2bids_map.py?
I would be interested enough in this to submit a pull request.