Closed StLoch closed 14 years ago
I don't know about divorcing the bindings from the C++ object, but amen to the duplication pains. I'm a little hesitant to suggest that we generate them using macros, since that would turn debugging them into a nightmare. Perhaps there's some way we can template setters and accessors for bound objects?
CLOSE DAMN YOU!
The current system has lots of duplication and is kind of a pain in the ass. It definitely needs some refactoring to get rid of the duplication, and we may want to consider totally divorcing bindings from the c++ object. Not sure if this is a great idea as the concepts are all closely related. At very least, the static functions and object functions of bound classes need to be better separated for readability.