Open egorpavlikhin opened 7 months ago
Hi @egorpavlikhin,
It looks like you should be able to just await _logger.flush()
or _logger.close()
Hi! I would really love to get a hold of this
Hi @egorpavlikhin,
It looks like you should be able to just await
_logger.flush()
or_logger.close()
Could you expose the _logger
on the .d.ts
please?
When flushing logs pino doesn't actually call _final and wait for the logs to flush when using streams. Instead it calls a poorly documented flushSync method that is not part of the stream.Writable interface. As the name suggests the function is not async and will block the event loop until the logs are flushed. Normally this wouldn't be an issue, but when running inside a Cloud function the function will often exit before the logs are flushed, so this implementation is in line with what pino recommends https://getpino.io/#/docs/asynchronous?id=aws-lambda
https://github.com/pinojs/pino/blob/c109804c6ce4b4545f3dfe1d021ceb698582fe15/lib/multistream.js#L82
In practice, without this change we had about 20% of our logs disappear as pino-seq would still be trying to send logs to seq when our Azure functions has already finished executing (eventually failing after a 30 seconds timeout).
How to review: I've been trying to find a good way to run async functions synchronously in javascript but couldn't. There are libraries that spawn a separate nodejs process and wait for completion there, but since this library doesn't necessarily run in nodejs context I thought it's a bit of an overkill. Happy to hear thoughts on how this should ideally look like.