Closed hancush closed 2 years ago
What is the expected behavior for top level units
name | unit | department |
---|---|---|
Karina, Alatorre | Cook County SD 130 | Cook County SD 130 |
or
name | unit | department |
---|---|---|
Karina, Alatorre | Cook County SD 130 |
@hancush could you let us know what the correct thing is here?
SD was a bad example because it doesn't have departments. This is more a problem for units like Cook County, which does have departments, which are not reflected in the export.
For units with departments:
name | unit | department |
---|---|---|
Name | Cook County | e.g., Stroger Hospital Of Cook Cnty |
For direct employees of a unit, my preference would be the following but I don't think it's a big deal if it's easier to just duplicate the unit name as the department:
name | unit | department |
---|---|---|
Karina, Alatorre | Cook County SD 130 |
okay, thanks!
Replicated for a couple of units:
Cook County
Cook County SD 130
Downloading data from the department page seems to behave correctly (unit in unit column, department in department column).