Closed fgregg closed 7 years ago
The annotation is supposed to serve this purpose. How's this revision?
The main purpose of this chart is to show that the disproportionality we've already demonstrated in several ways is persistent even as fewer arrests are made.
(I'm assuming this is the chart you're talking about?)
If it's this one, we say that proportionate arrests look like the population. Is showing the population not enough of a reference point to the reader? Would you change the label from population to expected arrests?
We are asking them to remember what the proportionate arrests would look like. Might be better not to make that ask.