Closed emmanuel closed 13 years ago
Thanks for these - I've commented on individual commits where I had questions. Overall, can you give me some context about these changes? Are you refactoring so you can achieve something you couldn't prior, or are you just giving it a spring clean?
Heh, oops; pardon the context-free refactor. I guess 'spring cleaning' about sums it up. I went trolling around through some of the DM libs when I started working on my current project (which uses DM).
In general I found the source in dm libs quite readable and good, but I also found some things that looked like they could be streamlined, so I earmarked them for clean up when I got the time (I also have pull requests open on dm-types and dm-core, so far).
Some of the changes I've proposed are stylistic and some are subjective design choices that I misread. For example I subsumed dm-timestamps
into a couple of new classes in dm-types
, but that isn't aligned with the responsibilities of Property
, so that patch was rejected.
Finally, I do also have a little thought about spring cleaning dm-validations
so it can more easily be integrated with virtus. But that's an idea in the abstract; these changes certainly do not relate to any integration plan.
Excellent. I don't have any objections to your changes, so will pull them in shortly.
Closing, covered by a newer pull request.
This is the third of three pull requests, and contains the most significant changes. This is dependent on the changes in the first pull request, but not on the second.