Allow additional args for colors in lasso

[maclandrol]

Changelogs

• Add support for some drawer options and fix edge cases where user-provided options are not properly handled. This concerns mostly the atom and bonds highlighting and color system

---

Checklist:

• [ ] Was this PR discussed in an issue? It is recommended to first discuss a new feature into a GitHub issue before opening a PR.
• [x] Add tests to cover the fixed bug(s) or the new introduced feature(s) (if appropriate).
• [x] Update the API documentation is a new function is added, or an existing one is deleted.
• [x] Write concise and explanatory changelogs below.
• [x] If possible, assign one of the following labels to the PR: feature, fix or test (or ask a maintainer to do it for you).

---

This PR allows us to now do something like this:

  smi = "CO[C@@H](O)C1=C(O[C@H](F)Cl)C(C#N)=C1ONNC[NH3+]"
  mol = dm.to_mol(smi)
  smarts_list = "CONN"
  highlight_atoms = [4, 5, 6]
  highlight_bonds = [1, 2, 3, 4]
  highlight_atom_colors = {4:(186,85,211), 5:(186,85,211), 6:(186,85,211)}
  highlight_bond_colors = {1:(186,85,211), 2:(186,85,211), 3:(186,85,211), 4:(186,85,211)}
  dm.lasso_highlight_image(mol, smarts_list, highlight_atoms=highlight_atoms, highlight_bonds=highlight_bonds, highlight_atom_colors=highlight_atom_colors, highlight_bond_colors=highlight_bond_colors, continuousHighlight=False, circleAtoms=False)

See the purple part of the molecule here.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (5d1cde1) 91.95% compared to head (e56d083) 91.99%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #223 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 91.95% 91.99% +0.03% ========================================== Files 46 46 Lines 3843 3873 +30 ========================================== + Hits 3534 3563 +29 - Misses 309 310 +1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/datamol-io/datamol/pull/223/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=datamol-io) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/datamol-io/datamol/pull/223/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=datamol-io) | `91.99% <100.00%> (+0.03%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=datamol-io#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.