When initially discussing these rules, my understanding is that the rule conditions were more specific: if this tool identifies this property as this, and this other tool identifies the same property as that, then pick this one. This seems to have been simplified to: if this property is conflicted (and given these other selected conditions), then use the selected property. Is this simplified algorithm going to correctly identify and cover all needed cases? Without comparing the conflicted metadata for a larger sample - which I can't do easily until issue #16 is resolved - I can't tell.
When initially discussing these rules, my understanding is that the rule conditions were more specific: if this tool identifies this property as this, and this other tool identifies the same property as that, then pick this one. This seems to have been simplified to: if this property is conflicted (and given these other selected conditions), then use the selected property. Is this simplified algorithm going to correctly identify and cover all needed cases? Without comparing the conflicted metadata for a larger sample - which I can't do easily until issue #16 is resolved - I can't tell.