Improves the utility of the general considerations page. Now it is presented as a how-to for those wishing to understand which publication strategy best suits their project.
Moves risk assessment content from the open at the end guidance to its own section.
Unifies multiple versions of peer review checklists into one location and stresses that the emphasis should be placed on Duckbook and NHS checklists.
Type of change
[ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
[X] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
[ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
Accessibility
NA
Advice for reviewer
Checklist:
[X] I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md guidance for raising pull requests
[X] I have followed the intended structure of this project
[X] I have performed a self-review
[X] This pull-request meets the accessibility guidance provided in the contributing guidance.
Description/Contribution Summary
Fixes #71
Motivation and Context
Type of change
Accessibility
NA
Advice for reviewer
Checklist:
Additional comments