datasets / awesome-data

Curated list of quality open datasets
https://datahub.io/collections
805 stars 102 forks source link

NUTS Administrative Boundaries #43

Closed rufuspollock closed 8 years ago

rufuspollock commented 10 years ago

@pudo do you already have these?

ThomasG77 commented 9 years ago

Waiting but I'm interested: it's geodata dataset and I do GIS. Which levels are wanted for NUTS? We can already use http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata/reference-data/administrative-units-statistical-units except if licence is not OK (not sure about this, not a lawyer).

What about LAU, a.g https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Local_administrative_unit?

rufuspollock commented 9 years ago

@ThomasG77 what levels are available for NUTS (I'm not an expert either). Re the license: we will sometimes live with a restrictive license (see e.g. ISO codes) but we will prominently note it and make clear that the data package license (if an open one) only applies to our efforts in packaging and that underlying data may have different and more restrictive rights that affect the data package.

Could you give more detail here on LAU ...

rufuspollock commented 9 years ago

@ThomasG77 are you interested in taking on - this would be a nice one to do.

ThomasG77 commented 9 years ago

I will begin to work on it. We may need to work on NUTS population overall instead of UK only e.g #51

rufuspollock commented 9 years ago

@ThomasG77 how are you doing here - note this is NUTS boundaries not populations per NUTS area

ThomasG77 commented 9 years ago

I will do it this week (end of the week because already busy before)

ThomasG77 commented 9 years ago

After a long time, it's done... See my repository at https://github.com/ThomasG77/geo-nuts-administrative-boundaries

Feedback welcome (PS: already good for validation and visualisation) before I give ownership to @datasets/owners

rufuspollock commented 9 years ago

@ThomasG77 great job and thanks for the persistence!

@Yannael are you happy to review?

Yannael commented 9 years ago

@ThomasG77 @rgrp

Nice! Data format and view seem good.

I could not run the code though.

"debug(drivers.prototype.getNames());
TypeError: Illegal invocation"

that I could not fix

Also,

Thanks!

ThomasG77 commented 9 years ago

@Yannael

Due to your feedback, I've done the changes:

Also, I don't have any issue with "debug(drivers.prototype.getNames());" Can you provide your system? On my side, for info, my OS is Ubuntu 14.04 64bits.

Yannael commented 9 years ago

@ThomasG77 Ok great

Regarding the issue with the code, my system is Mac OS X 10.7.5, and I have node.js v0.12.0

The complete error message is

/Users/yalb/Downloads/geo-nuts-administrative-boundaries-master/scripts/index.js:94
    debug(drivers.prototype.getNames());
                            ^
TypeError: Illegal invocation
    at Request.<anonymous> (/Users/yalb/Downloads/geo-nuts-administrative-boundaries-master/scripts/index.js:94:29)
    at Request.emit (events.js:129:20)
    at IncomingMessage.<anonymous> (/Users/yalb/Downloads/geo-nuts-administrative-boundaries-master/scripts/node_modules/request/request.js:1167:12)
    at IncomingMessage.emit (events.js:129:20)
    at _stream_readable.js:908:16
    at process._tickCallback (node.js:355:11)

Maybe this is a platform dependent issue, and I am not sufficiently acquainted to node.js to fix it

@rgrp What do think, ok to move to core repository?

ThomasG77 commented 9 years ago

@Yannael Can you remove the line doing debug(drivers.prototype.getNames()); on your local side and try again? This line was for learning purpose, so if it only fails here because of OS, it would be worth removing IMO.

Yannael commented 9 years ago

@ThomasG77 @rgrp

Commenting out the line is enough indeed, it runs fine now, great!

ThomasG77 commented 9 years ago

I've done changes in the code to fix issue and in the README.md description for the script path. The ownership has been changed too and the repo is currently at https://github.com/datasets/geo-nuts-administrative-boundaries The only thing we may change now could be the repository name? Other opinions @rgrp @Yannael ? Do I update https://github.com/datasets/registry/blob/master/catalog-list.txt and https://github.com/datasets/registry/blob/master/core-list.txt ?

Yannael commented 9 years ago

Nice, I updated catalog and core lists. The repository name is good for me

lexman commented 8 years ago

Hello,

has this dataset been published yet ?

rufuspollock commented 8 years ago

Good question. The answer is yes: http://data.okfn.org/data/core/geo-nuts-administrative-boundaries

rufuspollock commented 8 years ago

FIXED. This is done and live at http://data.okfn.org/data/core/geo-nuts-administrative-boundaries and https://github.com/datasets/geo-nuts-administrative-boundaries

rufuspollock commented 8 years ago

@pdehaye can we get this tweeted?

pdehaye commented 8 years ago

@rgrp done, tweeted

danfowler commented 8 years ago

:+1: