Closed yuqi1129 closed 7 months ago
Overall Project | 66.9% | :green_circle: |
---|
There is no coverage information present for the Files changed
Can you please paste the package structure here?
@xunliu @diqiu50 can you please help to review?
Can you please paste the package structure here?
I create a new directory gravitino-trino-connector
under the project root like distribution
and the folder structure is as follows:
├── gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
├── gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz.sha256
└── libs
├── HdrHistogram-2.1.9.jar
├── aopalliance-1.0.jar
├── bootstrap-235.jar
....
Can you please paste the package structure here?
I create a new directory
gravitino-trino-connector
under the project root likedistribution
and the folder structure is as follows:├── gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz ├── gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz.sha256 └── libs ├── HdrHistogram-2.1.9.jar ├── aopalliance-1.0.jar ├── bootstrap-235.jar ....
I think the key point is: a) to release this package conveniently; b) let trino to use it very easily.
Can you please paste the package structure here?
I create a new directory
gravitino-trino-connector
under the project root likedistribution
and the folder structure is as follows:├── gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz ├── gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz.sha256 └── libs ├── HdrHistogram-2.1.9.jar ├── aopalliance-1.0.jar ├── bootstrap-235.jar ....
I think the key point is: a) to release this package conveniently; b) let trino to use it very easily.
The final structure is like this, is it acceptable?
@xunliu @diqiu50 Please check if the tarball works well for trino connector.
What is the unzipped folder name? @yuqi1129
Can you please paste the package structure here?
I create a new directory
gravitino-trino-connector
under the project root likedistribution
and the folder structure is as follows:├── gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz ├── gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz.sha256 └── libs ├── HdrHistogram-2.1.9.jar ├── aopalliance-1.0.jar ├── bootstrap-235.jar ....
I think the key point is: a) to release this package conveniently; b) let trino to use it very easily.
The final structure is like this, is it acceptable?
What's the purpose of the "gravitino-trino-connector" directory.
What is the unzipped folder name?
Decompress the tarball gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
will get fold gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT
What is the unzipped folder name?
Decompress the tarball
gravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT.tar.gz
will get foldgravitino-trino-connector-0.2.0-SNAPSHOT
OK, that's fine.
I'm OK with the current change, @xunliu @yuqi1129 please review and verify.
@xunliu @diqiu50 Please check if the tarball works well for trino connector.
I have checked, it works.
I think the name of the directory after unpacking is too long. I suggest using "gravitino".
I think the name of the directory after unpacking is too long. I suggest using "gravitino".
Maybe we can tell user to remove the folder name if they think it is too long in doc. As a standalone package, I think the name "gravitino-trino-connector" is OK.
@yuqi1129 @diqiu50 what do you think?
@yuqi1129 @diqiu50 what do you think?
I don't think the folder's name is so important, as we can change it during decompression. We use the current name to clearly show that it's the Gravitino
trino connector.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
trino-connetor
asgravition-trinno-connector-{version}.tar.gz
and put it underdistribution
directorytrino-connector
accordingly.Why are the changes needed?
We need to package
trino-connector
when releasingGravitino
Fix: #542
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
No