Closed agbeltran closed 6 years ago
Issue with the new representation where we include an array of pairs (diseaseStatus, disease) is that it is not background compatible with previous DATS versions. But it seems the neater way of representing what we need.
An alternative for diseaseStatus would be to have an annotation property (so that people can tag with the ontology terms) rather than having an enum with yes/no/unknown.
An alternative solution that would keep the schemas background compatible would be to add the diseaseStatus to the disease_schema (and this makes more sense).
Closing this PR as we will use the alternative solution in #22
As requested by @kabolude