Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Hello,
Thank you for suggestions and especially for the picture. I implemented your
suggestions in version 0.9.1, so I'm closing this bug now.
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 7 Oct 2010 at 7:17
Terrific :D
I'm becoming addicted! Watching you implementation i found that the tags field
is better without any border, and the inside string left-aligned. The focus
glow is awesome :D
For the separators color i suggest the same of the popup border!
I modified the screenshot:
http://www.pctunerup.com/up//results/_201010/20101008004535_20101007192623_scrap
menu.png
PS: sorry if i seem intrusive :)
Original comment by focabresm
on 7 Oct 2010 at 10:59
There is a slight problem with input field without any border: it is hard to
discover when you don't know already what it is and you cannot see what space
it occupies (cursor change helps, but I think it is better with some other
indication). Maybe it is better to use dotted or dashed border instead? I can
left-align the placeholder, but then it should look different from the actual
tags... The popup border depends on OS and probably used theme, on my laptop it
is already the same as menu separator :) And glow effect was "built-in" for all
input fields :).
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 8 Oct 2010 at 7:08
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 8 Oct 2010 at 7:08
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 8 Oct 2010 at 7:08
The string could be "insert tags here..." that explains the function of the
field and is long enough to cover the entire field.
Like this: http://www.pctunerup.com/up//results/_201010/20101008120828_new menu
2.png
If you want to use a border for the field, maybe it can be more funny to use
the glowed border from the start with the word "tags..." inside (left-aligned).
Like this: http://www.pctunerup.com/up//results/_201010/20101008120849_new
menu.png
As you can see, in both the screenshots i removed the separator below the "Show
list..." entry maintaining inalterated the margin with "Last saved pages". The
play a similar function and it seems more sleek.
One thing i forgot to say it's about the triggering of the save function when
you are inside the tag field. You can associate a trigger with the enter key
button when you are writing the tags.
Finally i think that the field content has to be resetted when you save a page,
what do you think about this?
Original comment by focabresm
on 8 Oct 2010 at 10:19
Ops, the screenshots url are bad, you have to copy/paste including the menu.png
part.
Original comment by focabresm
on 8 Oct 2010 at 10:22
I think I'll do the following in the next version: input field without any
border by default, placeholder "tags..." on the left (it can be hard to
translate longer one and feet it into the field), dotted line on the bottom
will appear if the first menu entry is highlighted.
Saved content in the filed is intentional, so it can be used to save several
pages with same tags/categories (maybe I should rename them...).
I'm not sure if triggering save by pressing Enter is good idea... Maybe someone
wanted to press "Save all"...
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 8 Oct 2010 at 12:01
Ah, i didn't get that tags are also relevant for the "Save all open tabs"
entry...
Maybe in this case it's more logical to place a second field after that entry,
or this will be somewhat hard to discover. Furthermore, this will make the
enter triggering functional.
In the case you'll go for this, you have to take care of the indent of the
fields. Like this:
http://www.pctunerup.com/up//results/_201010/20101008143700_20101008120849_new%2
0menu.png
In regard of the saved field content, you could make this an option, letting
the user choose the behaviour. I hope other will join the discussion with
interesting tips...
Keep the good work, i wait for the next rev :)
Original comment by focabresm
on 8 Oct 2010 at 12:41
For now I released a version with my changes as in Comment 8.
Making saving of the filed content an option will be good. But then there
should be a way to add options. I'll look at this later, perhaps after I finish
reorganizing saved pages list (hopefully this weekend). And I prefer to have
only one input field for tags. Otherwise the menu looks too complex.
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 8 Oct 2010 at 1:14
Nice, the ui becomes more attractive from rev. to rev.
I'll wait your new commits, bye :)
Original comment by focabresm
on 8 Oct 2010 at 2:04
What do you think about 2 keyboard shortcut to trigger the page save when
writing tags? Something like: CTRL+ENTER for single page and CTRL+ALT+ENTER for
all tabs...
Original comment by focabresm
on 13 Oct 2010 at 7:11
Shortcuts should be easy, I'll look at it later.
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 13 Oct 2010 at 10:15
I added shortcuts in 0.10.2. It is Ctrl+Enter and Alt+Enter (Alt+Ctrl+Enter
should also work).
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 13 Oct 2010 at 8:37
@focabresm: I'm going to add options next. For now I have this idea about those
tags:
Save default tags:
x Always
Only for one browser session
Newer
Is it ok with you? Any other suggestions?
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 15 Oct 2010 at 9:44
Terrific! I will test the function as soon as you release the next rev.
I think that those 3 options cover all usability aspects of the "default tag"
function.
Original comment by focabresm
on 16 Oct 2010 at 2:37
Hi, I added those options in version 0.10.4. It was harder than I thought.
Hopefully it works.
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 17 Oct 2010 at 6:40
I tested it, it seems to work fine! Nice job :)
Now that i have many pages saved i see that it's a bit hard to recognize the
last saved pages. What about using an icon also for this?
Original comment by focabresm
on 18 Oct 2010 at 10:50
I added icons in 0.11
Original comment by eugeniy....@googlemail.com
on 18 Oct 2010 at 8:55
Awesome, super sleek :D
Nice idea shortening the title using the tooltip with the full title!
Original comment by focabresm
on 19 Oct 2010 at 8:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
focabresm
on 7 Oct 2010 at 5:27