Open geoffreymcgill opened 9 years ago
From @GoogleCodeExporter on April 18, 2015 5:50
Yep, this is a problem. The millisecond value in the iso 8601 format will cause
problems in the regex parsing. Without the millisecond value everything should
be
fine. I have not had a chance to investigate a fix, but it will almost certainly
involve an addition or modification to the regex that attempts to parse the
millisecond part.
Original comment by geoff
on 25 May 2008 at 3:28
From @GoogleCodeExporter on April 18, 2015 5:50
This issue has gained higher visibility after Blogger changed the output format
of
their Atom feeds. The "updated" field now shows dates like:
2003-12-13T18:30:02.25+01:00
Unfortunately datejs is unable to parse this.
Is there a simple workaround while this bug is fixed?
Original comment by sergio.n...@gmail.com
on 25 May 2008 at 4:01
From @GoogleCodeExporter on April 18, 2015 5:50
Just a quick note to add that these are valid RFC 3339 dates:
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3339.txt
Original comment by sergio.n...@gmail.com
on 25 May 2008 at 4:07
From @GoogleCodeExporter on April 18, 2015 5:50
FYI, for my immediate purposes, I just grepped the milliseconds out of the
string.
Original comment by redeemer...@gmail.com
on 27 May 2008 at 4:44
From @GoogleCodeExporter on April 18, 2015 5:50
Hi, here is patch that fixes the ISO 8601 milliseconds format problem.
Adds a new "iii" format, matches 3 digits with optional start dot
Adds a new format to use with parse() that parses ISO 8601 with milliseconds
Original comment by mattias....@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2010 at 4:38
Attachments:
From @GoogleCodeExporter on April 18, 2015 5:50
New patch, use "ss.s" as format instead which is much better and according to
the
format specification
Original comment by mattias....@gmail.com
on 5 Feb 2010 at 7:43
Attachments:
From @GoogleCodeExporter on April 18, 2015 5:50
[deleted comment]
From @GoogleCodeExporter on April 18, 2015 5:50
patched in my current fork: https://github.com/abritinthebay/datejs/
Original comment by darkcr...@gmail.com
on 9 Sep 2013 at 7:57
From @GoogleCodeExporter on April 18, 2015 5:50
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
redeemer...@gmail.com
on 24 May 2008 at 3:30Copied from original issue: datejs/DateJS#41