Closed AshokR closed 8 years ago
So the result now is about 85% tagging accuracy? One approach is to use better initial tagger. The internal initial tagger developed inside RDRPOSTagger uses a lexicon to assign a tag for each word, in which the lexicon is extracted from the training corpus, so this internal initial tagger is a weak initial tagger. You can improve the tagging accuracy by using a stronger "external" initial tagger such as TnT tagger.
It would be nice to have an empirical study (i.e. paper) of evaluating a range of POS taggers on your corpus :)
On further analysis I find that about half of the ones that had different tags from my gold standard testing corpus were all within the noun family. Either a compound noun is tagged as a noun or vice versa. This is not a show stopper. Excluding this, I see an error rate of only about 8%.
Thanks for your tip. I will look into the TnT tagger for the initial tagging.
And thanks again for making this software available and as open source!
FYI. TnT tagger can be also download from http://heartofgold.dfki.de/pkg/components-tnt.tar.gz
I am happy to report that, after extensive tweaking of my gold standard training corpus, I have successfully trained the tagger with a corpus of about 200,000 Tamil words. I used 80% of the corpus for training and 20% for testing. I see a difference of about 15% from my gold standard testing corpus.
It will be great if you can take a look at my corpus and let me know whether there is anything I can do to improve it.