Closed yoshuawuyts closed 6 years ago
Alternatively we could drop the Sync
bit entirely, and just swap to an async implementation once Futures hit 1.0.0. Use semver major to mark the switch.
Feels like it might be a bit neater. We could then rename the struct to Storage
or something.
impl RandomAccessStorage for Storage
We could probably rename it to
Synchronous
or something else. It currently conflicts with thestd
https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/std/marker/trait.Sync.html trait which is available on almost every struct.