Closed amelie-iska closed 9 months ago
Hello! I think in the fixed_residues_multi example B38 is fixed.
Input PDB, residue B38 is GLY: https://github.com/dauparas/LigandMPNN/blob/main/inputs/4GYT.pdb#L3957 Designed sequence PDB, residue B38 is GLY: https://github.com/dauparas/LigandMPNN/blob/main/outputs/fixed_residues_multi/backbones/4GYT_1.pdb#L1666C9-L1666C29
I wonder if the confusion is coming from the fact that the first residue in the chain B is B7 (https://github.com/dauparas/LigandMPNN/blob/main/outputs/fixed_residues_multi/backbones/4GYT_1.pdb#L1666C9-L1666C29), so if you look at fasta sequence output B38 is not the 38th residue.
I see! Thank you. I believe that was the issue, I just didn't realize the residues didn't start at 1. Sorry about that, and thank you for the response.
Running the following command:
for a PDB with two chains only fixes the first three residues of chain A, but does not fix the residues in the second chain B. I also noticed this seems to be the case in the
fixed_rediues_multi
example output provided. It appears thatB38
was not fixed in chain B. This also seems to happen with theredesigned_residues
example as well, and only chain A has its residues fixed.