Closed mibk closed 7 years ago
Also, please read the contributing section about slinging code before discussing a feature. I would like it if you took my comment https://github.com/davecheney/httpstat/pull/16#issuecomment-249330987 and created a new issue where we can discuss the implementation before jumping to the code.
Apologies, this is my mistake. I have read the contributing section but thought this is a small and reasonable enough change it's not worth creating an issue for it. Well, lesson learnt. Sorry again.
Your suggestion seems reasonable. I think I'm able to do it. But now I should probably go to bed...
This is my fault, I should have made it clear in the to-do that sorting isn't implemented because I wanted something more than just an alpha sort.
On Sat, 24 Sep 2016, 10:31 Michal Bohuslávek notifications@github.com wrote:
Apologies, this is my mistake. I have read the contributing section but thought this is a small and reasonable enough change it's not worth creating an issue for it. Well, lesson learnt. Sorry again.
Your suggestion seems reasonable. I think I'm able to do it. But now I should probably go to bed...
— You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/davecheney/httpstat/pull/16#issuecomment-249332280, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAcA9miog-B3zXrlNj3ogkuWgGkNbuEks5qtG9vgaJpZM4KFf7f .
I thought about this previously and have two suggestions.
Host:
firstI know this is more work, but I think this is only worth doing if it's done to this degree of precision.