Open trevan opened 5 years ago
The license-checker is detecting the wrong license for https://github.com/greensock/GreenSock-JS/.
If you run license-checker, it says: ├─ gsap@2.1.1 │ ├─ licenses: MIT* │ ├─ repository: https://github.com/greensock/GreenSock-JS │ ├─ path: node_modules/gsap │ └─ licenseFile: node_modules/gsap/README.md
But it isn't MIT nor any other standard license. The README.md has: License
GreenSock's standard "no charge" license can be viewed at http://greensock.com/standard-license. Club GreenSock members are granted additional rights. See http://greensock.com/licensing/ for details. Why doesn't GreenSock use an MIT (or similar) open source license, and why is that a good thing? This article explains it all: http://greensock.com/why-license/
Copyright (c) 2008-2019, GreenSock. All rights reserved.
The license-checker is detecting the wrong license for https://github.com/greensock/GreenSock-JS/.
If you run license-checker, it says: ├─ gsap@2.1.1 │ ├─ licenses: MIT* │ ├─ repository: https://github.com/greensock/GreenSock-JS │ ├─ path: node_modules/gsap │ └─ licenseFile: node_modules/gsap/README.md
But it isn't MIT nor any other standard license. The README.md has: License
GreenSock's standard "no charge" license can be viewed at http://greensock.com/standard-license. Club GreenSock members are granted additional rights. See http://greensock.com/licensing/ for details. Why doesn't GreenSock use an MIT (or similar) open source license, and why is that a good thing? This article explains it all: http://greensock.com/why-license/
Copyright (c) 2008-2019, GreenSock. All rights reserved.