Closed Kexolotl closed 1 year ago
I think it happens because the logic in https://github.com/davglass/license-checker/blob/master/lib/license.js
is matching first for the BSD template, so the Apache condition is never met.
For BSD licenses, the code looks for the term distribution and use in source and binary forms, with or withou
and for Apache it looks for term Apache License
. But the license file for the guacamole module contains both! https://github.com/padarom/guacamole-common-js/blob/main/LICENSE
Last time it was shown as
{
"licence": "Apache-2.0 & SIL Open Font & BSD-3-Clause",
....
}
Something changed in the checker?
Thx for your answer. I guess in the past my colleague fix this in the fixed-package.json. Haven't seen that this is fixed to a specific version.
@schaefergregor This project is now being maintained at https://github.com/RSeidelsohn/license-checker-rseidelsohn See if the issue persists there, and report if so.
Hi together, today I checked the license for our software code. I recognised that the license of GuacamoleCommonJS gets returned as BSD*.
In our older versions with guacamole-common-js@1.3.0 it was returned correctly as Apache2.0.
Can you help me with this?