Quotes and also italics is almost never necessary; one or the other is sufficient
se modernize-spelling makes some changes; some should be accepted but the ones in verse should be rejected
In general, we can remove the XML comments that are inline with the text. This is what the commit history is for; changes marked [Editorial] allow us to inspect the differences and reasons for the differences. We also have the production-notes element, so inline comments are triply redundant.
You can add the marc win relator to Brown. If it's been supposed he wrote it, and there's no more evidence he didn't, then it's fine to add it.
<abbr class="name"> around your initial in the colophon
In general if <em> is marking up a fragment of a clause, the ending punctuation goes outside of </em>. For example inviting you to partake the perils and glory of your <em>white fellow citizens, I expected much from you;</em> should be inviting you to partake the perils and glory of your <em>white fellow citizens, I expected much from you</em>; This occurs in more than a few places, search with this regex [!;\.,?]</em>
In the song in chapter 16, <cite> doesn't belong in <header>. Usually there's only one <cite> which is used as the source of the quote. You can just remove <cite> and leave <p>. Note that you have to apply text-align center and small caps to override the default poetry styling text-align.
Is the preface a letter? If not then it doesn't need the sender or dateline semantics. It doesn't look like a letter to me.
Also please capitalize the half title according to the linter's rules. Then, you can add an se-lint-ignore.xml file for the remaining error which is an exception.
It looks like most/all
<i>
elements are missing semanticsNote that words used as words get double quotes, not italics https://standardebooks.org/manual/1.0.0/8-typography#8.2.9.1
Quotes and also italics is almost never necessary; one or the other is sufficient
se modernize-spelling makes some changes; some should be accepted but the ones in verse should be rejected
In general, we can remove the XML comments that are inline with the text. This is what the commit history is for; changes marked [Editorial] allow us to inspect the differences and reasons for the differences. We also have the production-notes element, so inline comments are triply redundant.
You can add the marc
win
relator to Brown. If it's been supposed he wrote it, and there's no more evidence he didn't, then it's fine to add it.<abbr class="name">
around your initial in the colophonIn general if
<em>
is marking up a fragment of a clause, the ending punctuation goes outside of</em>
. For exampleinviting you to partake the perils and glory of your <em>white fellow citizens, I expected much from you;</em>
should beinviting you to partake the perils and glory of your <em>white fellow citizens, I expected much from you</em>;
This occurs in more than a few places, search with this regex[!;\.,?]</em>
In the song in chapter 16,
<cite>
doesn't belong in<header>
. Usually there's only one<cite>
which is used as the source of the quote. You can just remove<cite>
and leave<p>
. Note that you have to apply text-align center and small caps to override the default poetry styling text-align.Is the preface a letter? If not then it doesn't need the sender or dateline semantics. It doesn't look like a letter to me.