Closed brandonegbert closed 6 years ago
@brandonegbert So the input is for per cycle whereas the left panel is per second. In order to convert per cycle to per second, I divide the output by 600 (600 seconds in a cycle). So 138,000 grams per cycle would result in 230 grams per second.
The water is off then. It's coming out to 5,000*12=60,000.
Actually this only seems to happen with negative numbers. I'm trying to represent that each dupe will use a lavatory once a cycle which uses 5,000g of water and produces 11,500g of polluted water. What would be the correct way to represent that?
@brandonegbert Nice catch, the negative numbers did not perform the conversion to per second correctly. I have updated GitHub with the 1ca68e2 commit and published to the live site. Thank you.
See the screenshot. Not sure what's going on here but 12 dupes producing 11,500g of polluted water (ie a lavatory) each should be 138,000 in output. I have no idea where the 230 number is coming from.