It is tempting to add a new state so that an "issued" batch can move
into, say, "oblivion" ("expired" would be confusing.) That would however
distract from the core logic.
We still require CAs to maintain a list of all batches and its
assertions, but don't require them to expose them after the storage
window. I think that's ok.
bwesterb
commented
10 months ago
It is tempting to add a new state so that an "issued" batch can move into, say, "oblivion" ("expired" would be confusing.) That would however distract from the core logic.
We still require CAs to maintain a list of all batches and its assertions, but don't require them to expose them after the storage window. I think that's ok.
GH https://github.com/davidben/merkle-tree-certs/issues/2
(Note: forked from #44)