davidchambers / cube

Magic: The Gathering Cube
http://davidchambers.github.io/cube/
2 stars 1 forks source link

add Tezzeret the Seeker #24

Closed davidchambers closed 9 years ago

davidchambers commented 9 years ago

Tezzeret the Seeker

What shall we cut?

weakplayer commented 9 years ago

muck undo imo, i'm not into cards that are purely for the sideboard... and i don't think drafting a strat where u cast it on your own boys is that viable in this

Luggsie commented 9 years ago

I don't like him.

On 24/12/2014, at 12:58 pm, weakplayer notifications@github.com wrote:

muck undo imo, i'm not into cards that are purely for the sideboard... and i don't think drafting a strat where u cast it on your own boys is that viable in this

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

davidchambers commented 9 years ago

I don't like him.

Him being Tezzeret?

weakplayer commented 9 years ago

what's your beef luggsie?

weakplayer commented 9 years ago

i'd rather this boy than heaps of the other plainswalkers

Luggsie commented 9 years ago

I just think the core objective was a cube that encouraged or revolved around combat or honest battles for the most part.

Not something I voted for but learnt after chatting with Dave.

With that in mind I think there are better PWs that achieve a step towards that direction than this man.

Artefact.dec usually isnt very interactive and can be OP. Even the inclusion of academy is questionable IMO.

Just my 2c

On 24/12/2014, at 1:14 pm, weakplayer notifications@github.com wrote:

i'd rather this boy than heaps of the other plainswalkers

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

weakplayer commented 9 years ago

i don't think artefacts are that strong atm in this cube, its not like this dude comes down and can use the ulti straight up, u need some kind of board advantage + the artifacts in play, its not that easy imo..

what u think dave?

Luggsie commented 9 years ago

If that's the case then surely there are better cards (if he's not much use - too narrow)

Sent from my iPad

On 24/12/2014, at 1:28 pm, weakplayer notifications@github.com wrote:

i don't think artefacts are that strong atm in this cube, its not like this dude comes down and can use the ulti straight up, u need some kind of board advantage + the artifacts in play, its not that easy imo..

what u think dave?

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

davidchambers commented 9 years ago

i'd rather this boy than heaps of the other plainswalkers

There's not a single plainswalker I'd pick over this fellow. :P

I just think the core objective was a cube that encouraged or revolved around combat or honest battles for the most part.

Combat should be central, though the most important thing is that the decks be interactive. I don't want to see Inkwell Leviathan getting tinkered into play on turn two. Tezzeret is more interesting, as he's likely to fetch defensive, interactive cards in many cases.

surely there are better cards (if he's not much use - too narrow)

He is narrow. I worry that @weakplayer is to some extent crafting the deck he'd like to draft in advance, as Shaun once did. I'm okay with this, because the suggestions are usually well reasoned, but I do worry a bit about the colours which aren't receiving as much attention.

weakplayer commented 9 years ago

mate i just want him as an AWC for land.dec xD

weakplayer commented 9 years ago

but its cool if u guys dont like him

Luggsie commented 9 years ago

Depends on the format.

Jace is widely regarded as best but that's beside the point.

I think you guys have a soft spot for him in which case that's fine. I do think we want to avoid artifact.dec though. It generally break rules of magic.

Sent from my iPad

On 24/12/2014, at 1:46 pm, David Chambers notifications@github.com wrote:

i'd rather this boy than heaps of the other plainswalkers

There's not a single plainswalker I'd pick over this fellow. :P

I just think the core objective was a cube that encouraged or revolved around combat or honest battles for the most part.

Combat should be central, though the most important thing is that the decks be interactive. I don't want to see Inkwell Leviathan getting tinkered into play on turn two. Tezzeret is more interesting, as he's likely to fetch defensive, interactive cards in many cases.

surely there are better cards (if he's not much use - too narrow)

He is narrow. I worry that @weakplayer is to some extent crafting the deck he'd like to draft in advance, as Shaun once did. I'm okay with this, because the suggestions are usually well reasoned, but I do worry a bit about the colours which aren't receiving as much attention.

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

weakplayer commented 9 years ago

so you'd muck the tolarian academy then?

cole will cry

davidchambers commented 9 years ago

Cole's HoM 3 decklist is informative. This deck is undoubtedly an artifact deck, yet Cole's matches (such as the final against James) were interesting, with each game playing out differently. I believe by withholding Tinker and possibly other cards it's possible to have an artifact deck which does unfair things sometimes but which isn't broken. I'm just not sure whether Tezzeret is one of the cards we should be withholding.

Luggsie commented 9 years ago

We'll if it was up to me Id muck it

Seriously it's always up to no good. To be honest though I think it's fine in a cube that is balanced I think it's of a level that puts it ahead of other cards/colours ATM

Sent from my iPad

On 24/12/2014, at 2:05 pm, weakplayer notifications@github.com wrote:

so you'd muck the tolarian academy then?

cole will cry

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

davidchambers commented 9 years ago

I'm saying no to Tezzeret. It's a very powerful card in exactly one deck.

weakplayer commented 9 years ago

all good