Closed MonsieurTib closed 4 years ago
Since 0.9 is an abandoned draft that never became a standard and there is a final version of AMQP, which is very different, the name "Amqp" is misleadingly inaccurate in spite of the RabbitMQ community clinging on to it.
The namespace and classes should be called "RabbitMq" and the name Amqp should be reserved for the OASIS and ISO/IEC standard AMQP 1.0.
Damn, RabbitMq is the only using amqp 0.9 ? I’ll change namespace and classes..
@davidfowl, this PR is still a good candidate for Bedrock protocols ?
@MonsieurTib yep!
Cool. After RabbitMQ, i’ll try to find time for Amqp 1.0 protocol 😎
Cool. After RabbitMQ, i’ll try to find time for Amqp 1.0 protocol 😎
I would suggest to look at http://azure.github.io/amqpnetlite/ and see whether you work with @xinchen10 on creating an integration with bedrock that uses a maximum of shared code
Since COVID 19, we are in total quarantine (in france), therefore i have to reorganize my activity (given that i work as freelancer) and i have no ideo when/if i could continue this PR in the medium/long term. @davidfowl maybe you can close this PR or merge this small contribution if folks wants to contribute. It's up to you
I’ll take it over. Stay safe
This is a first version of amqp protocol (0-9-1, RabbitMQ compatible). Currently, protocol implementation provides connection, authentication, tuning, and queue declaration Edit : Since 0-9-1 seems to be implemented only by RabbitMq, i updated this PR's title