Open dazinator opened 3 years ago
Don't use that method to create disposable instances. Seriously though, we should document it, it's a flaw in the design.
hi @davidfowl . another question related to this. There are a few cases where the IServiceProvider
got injected into the constructor. Isn't this a service locator
pattern? A few articles on the inernet see this as a anti-pattern and will not suggest to do so. What is the main factor when considering such pattern?
@ExceptionCaught A common use-case for this, is when you have "incompatible" lifetimes. where you need to consume a scoped service inside of a singleton service. For example. using a Database Context (scoped) in Hosted Services (singleton).
hi @BorisWilhelms . in this case, the Hosted Services
is singleton and initiated during the application starts, does it mean we will do
IServiceProvider.GetService<DBContext>()
in one of the methods. but not in the constructor?
@ExceptionCaught In your singleton, you will have to create your own scope, like
using (var scope = serviceProvider.CreateScope())
{
var dbContext = scope.ServiceProvider.GetService<DBContext>();
// ...
}
Try to keep the scope's lifecycle as short as possible.
There is a note at the bottom of this section: https://github.com/davidfowl/DotNetCodingPatterns/blob/main/1.md#creating-instances-of-types-from-an-iserviceprovider
It's interesting to note that
ActivatorUtilities
also has aGetServiceOrCreateInstance
method. However its not possible to tell when calling this API, if the instance returned was resolved from a registration, or was not registered and so a new instance was created. Given the note above, if the service wasIDisposable
- how can the consumer know if they are, or are not responsible for disposing the instance when obtaining services like this? It feels like theGetServiceOrCreateInstance
method should supply anout
parameter indicating whether the service was returned and is being tracked, or whether an instance was created and therefore is not being tracked ?