Closed davidker closed 7 years ago
created branch githubissue-86-upstream with the fixes for this.
I looked at all of your patches in githubissue-86-upstream, and have included all my comments below.
Commit 2937f9a5682318115773807e431ab731ab253255 - staging: unisys: visorbus: Reorder functions to avoid including header
You should have just removed this line instead of just commenting it out:
+//#include "visorbus_private.h"
Commit e20a59dfa811813e90bcdf0dd80cb1b0c8e74713 - staging: unisys: visorbus: merge vbusdeviceinfo.h into vbuschannel
#include "vbuschannel.h"
from visorbus_main.c does NOT appear to be directly related to getting rid of vbusdeviceinfo.h
. Should this be a separate patch?Commit fb5640532d867db8f4ede8ef04e957cccf54e724 - staging: unisys: visorbus: Merge iovmcall into vmcallinterface
iovmcall_gnuc
, instead of just iovmcall
.Commit a43896f75c97d2d2bfb03058080b80fefd43bd64 - staging: unisys: visorbus: merge guestlinuxdebug with vmcallinterface.h
#ifdef __GNUC__
-- should that be a separate patch?Signed-off-by: Tim Sell <Timothy.Sell@unisys.com>
Tim, I updated the branch and renamed it to the proper github issues with your comments. Do you really want a Signed-off-by or do you want Reviewed-by: ?
I also need to figure out how to do that automatically.
Oops... you're right, I meant:
Reviewed-by: Tim Sell <Timothy.Sell@unisys.com>
At least one of the files has been included and it appears Greg accepted them all. I think there are still more issues but we will uncover them as we so more cleanup. One of the commits that is f6573adedb7d8ee4be3a88fdb2b2e944695946d7
Looks at visorbus.h files after the move is visorbus.h still use " or should it use <>?
That's loads of "private" .h files, are they all really needed?
Github issues #68, #63, #67, #76 and revisit.
Added to KanBoard