Closed ghost closed 7 years ago
visorbus/visorchipset.c:384: switch (which_string) { // existing default
visorbus/visorchipset.c:729: switch (cmd) { // bus_epilog()
visorbus/visorchipset.c:780: switch (cmd) { // device_epilog()
visorbus/visorchipset.c:1699: switch (offset) { // existing default
visorbus/visorchipset.c:1752: switch (cmd) { // existing default
visorbus/visorchipset.c:1931: switch (inmsg.hdr.id) { // existing default
visorhba/visorhba_main.c:739: switch (pendingdel->cmdtype) { // existing default
visorinput/visorinput.c:395: switch (devtype) { // **added**
visorinput/visorinput.c:511: switch (keycode) { // existing default
visorinput/visorinput.c:554: switch (x) { // existing default
visorinput/visorinput.c:590: switch (r.activity.action) { // *added*
visornic/visornic_main.c:1044: switch (copy.numrcvbufs) { // existing default
visornic/visornic_main.c:1573: switch (cmdrsp->net.type) { // existing default
Branch: githubissue-99-staging-next-TurningWrenches Commit(s): cc99fdd9a296d6c626c44297705f6e060166d039 checkpatch-cleared: Yes. T710-1 verified: Yes.
David, I'm going to hold off on submitting this one until I submit the patches to remove the epilog functions. My reasoning is that he complained about the ones in epilog, if we fix visorinput and he remembers he might come back and say why aren't you fixing the ones I complained about. When in reality I am getting rid of it.
Sounds great. Thanks!
Committed to staging-next at a4e93a694877b68b88eb6e06442ad904809eef51
default?