Addresses #40. Definitely uglier than for...in, but a) for...of wasn't working as expected for some of the instances, b) would've required more aggressive changes than replacement for loops and c) might've introduced browser compatibility issues for older browsers.
Also did a rebuild and made a bug fix version bump.
Addresses #40. Definitely uglier than
for...in, but a)for...ofwasn't working as expected for some of the instances, b) would've required more aggressive changes than replacementforloops and c) might've introduced browser compatibility issues for older browsers.Also did a rebuild and made a bug fix version bump.