Looking ahead to code changes, we’ll want to be able to play around with different S functions, and especially with an expanded male strategy space (the s parameter). The new Holy Grail –identifying the male ESS strategy when the strategy space is (s1, s2) and the s parameters lie in [-1, 1].
It would be cool find that making s continuous in [-1, 1] gives you strategies that are never an ESS and males should never randomise. That is, the only possible ESS is [1,1], [-1,-1] or [1,-1]. We have now just the first two as G and g. If the 3rd (“build a hierarchy”) is the only addition we need it would be great.
Quoting @markeschaffer