Audit in response to NASA reported weaknesses

[davidwhogg]

• The proposal did not have sufficient detail about how the three separate work efforts (information, p-modes, stochastics) would be conducted simultaneously. The proposal did not sufficiently discuss how the success or lack of success in a given area might affect the other two, and thus represents a risk to the success of the investigation overall. The cumulative unification of the three separate work areas was also insufficiently documented in the proposal.
• The Table of Personnel and Work Effort in the proposal did not have sufficient documentation of the level of effort from the co-I. The proposal indicated that the co-I’s contributions are essential to the success of the proposed work, and thus this represents a risk to the success of the proposal.
• The proposal did not sufficiently emphasize the RV performance numbers, and the gain in precision was not robustly quantified. The proposal did not adequately document the current performance of wobble on existing data.

[davidwhogg]

This involves also modifying facilities.tex and also calling out facilities.tex in the main body of the proposal.