davidwhogg / TheThresher

we Don't Throw Away Data (tm).
GNU General Public License v2.0
12 stars 5 forks source link

show that non-negative affects faint stars #30

Open davidwhogg opened 12 years ago

davidwhogg commented 12 years ago

I would like to show in the triple system that we get different flux ratios when we run with and without non-negative. If that is true, it is instructive, and lets us make an argument against Magain and also Hirsch.

fedhere commented 12 years ago

i have been thinking about this a bit: if flux is not conserved that is of course crippling. BJ wrote some code to produce synthetic speckles and I do plan on running some tests of your code, and of standard lucky, on it tomorrow.

fed

On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 11:23 AM, David W. Hogg < reply@reply.github.com

wrote:

I would like to show in the triple system that we get different flux ratios when we run with and without non-negative. If that is true, it is instructive, and lets us make an argument against Magain and also Hirsch.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/davidwhogg/LuckyImaging/issues/30


federica bianco UCSB-Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network 6740 Cortona Dr, Suite 102 / Goleta, CA /

LCOGT.net \ o\ http://secure.lcogt.net/user/fbianco/dev/


/|/\ |* Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail